|
|
Post by Synthax on Sept 27, 2003 17:59:39 GMT -5
Which are better? CDs are obviously more durable and it's much easier to reproduce in digital format...nobody has a record player in their friggin' cars. But, why does playin' vinyl just give me a fuller feeling of satisfaction? The sounds just sound better...probably because the sound is actually being made right there, as the needle crossed the vinyl. Hell, I dunno...I like 'em both. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Colleenosaurus on Sept 27, 2003 19:53:54 GMT -5
Hmm...I don't know. CDs are definitely a lot more convenient, but there is something hypnotic and comforting about records. I couldn't choose between them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bulldada on Sept 30, 2003 12:00:49 GMT -5
Washing cloths on a wash board or washing cloths in a machine?  Indoor plumming or outhouse? Get with it people!!!! If you like the crackling noise listen to AM radio while you play your Luke Vibert disc. Records are made for scratching. |
|
|
|
Post by Aeristotle on Sept 30, 2003 12:53:29 GMT -5
i like vinyl only when the artist decides that is the medium on which they choose to put something out on otherwise i prefer cd's and besides i dont own a record player
|
|
frankiesaysrelax
Infant
Time and again I tell myself...I'll stay clean tonight
Posts: 21
|
Post by frankiesaysrelax on Oct 22, 2003 15:40:46 GMT -5
 It depends honestly! CDs are easier to bring around, and sound better as in quality. but records are timeless, sound more genuine, but are bulky. I would say CDs are just a tad better than a record for listening. See I COLLECT records and LISTEN to CDs. *shrug*
|
|
|
|
Post by Anagrama on Nov 21, 2003 16:31:36 GMT -5
To paraphrase Pearl Jam:
There is something ultimately satisfying about having that record sleeve in front of you when you listen to an album. It just seems to be more personal
besides, the value of cd's as a medium is declining, thanks to mp3's and home networking
of course, i still have a tape deck in my car
|
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jan 22, 2004 0:23:40 GMT -5
cds are better
|
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jan 23, 2004 4:48:30 GMT -5
only thing that sucks about both is if they get scratched up they are useless
|
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jan 23, 2004 4:48:53 GMT -5
cds are easier to take care of
|
|
|
|
Post by Synthax on Jan 23, 2004 9:45:08 GMT -5
cds are easier to take care of So...what you're saying is...if you're a lazy bastard, CDs are better?  That's coo...I'm a lazy bastard.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bulldada on Jan 23, 2004 10:52:16 GMT -5
So...what you're saying is...if you're a lazy bastard, CDs are better? That's coo...I'm a lazy bastard. I'm lazier that you!! |
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jan 24, 2004 2:49:32 GMT -5
yes i'm saying i'm lazy
|
|
Indoor plumming or outhouse? 
It depends honestly! CDs are easier to bring around, and sound better as in quality. but records are timeless, sound more genuine, but are bulky. I would say CDs are just a tad better than a record for listening.
